The latest update is that the Arctic Sea Ice maximum has been reached for this year and so the seasonal melt has commenced.
Ten lowest maximum Arctic sea ice extents (satellite record, 1979 to present)
If we just had the second lowest, then that just might cause you to wonder what the lowest extents have been. Since they have very precise satellite records dating back to 1979 then it becomes easy to construct a table containing the top 10 lowest. Here it is …
| Rank | Year | In millions of square kilometers | In millions of square miles | Date |
| 1 | 2017 | 14.42 | 5.57 | March 7 |
| 2 | 2018 | 14.48 | 5.59 | March 17 |
| 3 | 2015 | 14.52 | 5.61 | February 25 |
| 3 | 2016 | 14.52 | 5.61 | March 24 |
| 5 | 2011 | 14.67 | 5.66 | March 9 |
| 5 | 2006 | 14.68 | 5.67 | March 12 |
| 7 | 2007 | 14.77 | 5.7 | March 12 |
| 8 | 2005 | 14.95 | 5.77 | March 12 |
| 8 | 2014 | 14.96 | 5.78 | March 21 |
| 10 | 2009 | 15.17 | 5.84 | March 5 |
What becomes immediately apparent is that the four lowest extents for the arctic sea ice maximum have been the four past years 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018.
This year’s maximum extent is 1.16 million square kilometers (448,000 square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 average maximum of 15.64 million square kilometers (6.04 million square miles).
How important is tracking the winter maximum?
Rather obviously there are seasonal variations of a summer melt and then ice growth during the winter period. We also know that the maximum ice extent is usually February / March and the minimum is usually sometime about September.
If we put aside the aspect of it simply being interesting to note when it happens and how far the extent was, then what does this really tell us?
What is perhaps more important is to monitor and track not just the daily extents and also the monthly averages. If you track just the maximum or minimum then you are not simply measuring climate, but you are also mixing in weather. Ice can rapidly vary in just one month and be impacted by wind and currents, hence it becomes important to average things out so that you smooth out the weather variations and can then see the climate effects.
Right now there are monthly averages for February, but we do not yet have the monthly averages for March. We will need to wait until April before we get that.
As an example, below you will find a chart illustrating the February averages over the years. Because we are looking at an averaged february measurement, we have in effect smoothed out the daily weather variations and so over time we can see the downward climate trend over the various February over the decades of accurate satellite measurements …
Why does this matter?
It is a siren that is loudly alerting us that climate change is real. Climate Change is not simply something that will happen in a far distant future, but instead it is happening now.
We should not simply be “interested”, but rather we should be worried about what is happening, why it is happening, and understand that we face an actual existential crises.
“We’ve probably known for 100 years that as the climate warms up in response to loading the atmosphere with greenhouse gases, we would see the changes first in the Arctic, This is what we expected and this is exactly what has happened. It’s a case where we hate to say we told you so, but we told you so.” – Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder,
Over the past one million years the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere has bounced between 180 and 280 ppm. We have pushed that up to close to 409.66 ppm right now and it is still climbing.
Further insights from the New York Times
They have a great article that lays out the implications of all of this …
With each passing decade, the ice grows a bit less in winter, and melts a bit more in summer.
The disappearing sea ice is a key indicator of a warming Arctic. And the consequences of a warming Arctic can be felt further south. A growing number of researchers are linking the changes up north to unusual winter weather in North America and Europe.
In recent weeks, the Northeastern United States faced four nor’easters in as many weeks, and Western Europe encountered subzero temperatures that were far lower than at the North Pole.
These weather patterns are influenced by the jet stream, the river of wind that encircles the Northern Hemisphere, said Jennifer A. Francis, an Arctic researcher at Rutgers University. Temperature differences between the Arctic and the lower latitudes help create the jet stream. Because the Arctic is warming twice as fast as the rest of the Earth, that temperature difference is getting smaller. As a result, the jet stream is getting weaker and shifting its behavior, sending cold air south from the Arctic and pumping warm air north.
The weakening jet stream also helps keep weather patterns locked in place, Dr. Francis said. “We’ve been in this pattern along the East Coast that is very conducive to the formation of nor’easter-type storms,” she said. “Part of the reason for that is because we’ve had this pattern in the jet stream that’s been so persistent.”
Dr. Francis’s theory is not settled science, Dr. Serreze said. Other researchers have posited that changes in ocean currents in the tropical Pacific are the source of the recent weather events in the midlatitudes.
“But I would say that the weight of evidence is resting on the side of a significant Arctic influence,” Dr. Serreze said.
The loss of Arctic sea ice should concern everyone, he added. “What happens in the Arctic doesn’t stay in the Arctic,” he said.